ArticleBMC medicine2025
Major depressive disorder recognition based on electronic handwriting recorded in psychological tasks.
Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Improvement of the Stability of Functionalized PVA Nanofibers for Sensitive Compound Incorporation by Gentle Freeze-Thaw Treatment.ACS omega · 2026Article
- A scoping review of the use of artificial intelligence as a psychological assessment tool.Translational psychiatry · 2026Article
- Mechanism-Driven Translation of Electroacupuncture for Depression: Bridging the Gap Between Preclinical and Clinical Research.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- Depression detection using deep learning and large language models from multimodalities.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study aimed to determine whether handwriting patterns are altered in individuals experiencing depressive episodes. Additionally, we developed a model for the recognition of major depressive disorder (MDD) based on electronic handwriting in psychological tasks.
methodsA total of 130 patients and 117 healthy controls completed 21 psychology-related handwriting tasks. The electronic tablet recorded several handwriting characteristics, including horizontal and vertical coordinates, nib pressure and speed, and inclination angle. The statistical indicators for each handwriting characteristic were calculated. Statistical analyses, including differential analysis, were performed to identify predictors of depression. Furthermore, logistic regression and machine learning models were developed to discriminate MDD.
resultsThe study included 130 patients with onset depression (mean (standard deviation (SD)) age, 20.42 (5.21)) and 117 healthy controls (mean (SD) age, 20.54 (2.60)). The t-test and logistics analysis results indicated that depressed patients exhibited a higher minimum of handwriting pressure, an elevated median of handwriting speed, and greater pen tip jitter. The LightGBM machine learning model exhibited satisfactory performance, with a cross-validated area under the receiver operating curve of mean 0.90 (SD, 0.01). The analysis of variance revealed that the negative question-answer task model exhibited superior performance compared to the neutral and positive task models.
conclusionsThe present study indicates that depressed patients exhibit modal handwriting changes and developed a cost-effective, rapid, and valid model for identifying MDD. This finding established a strong foundation for developing multimodal recognition models in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.