Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361100›Full record

ArticleBMC medicine2025

Exploring metabolomics for colorectal cancer risk prediction: evidence from the UK Biobank and ESTHER cohorts.

Teresa Seum, Rafael Cardoso, Joshua Stevenson-Hoare, Bernd Holleczek, Ben Schöttker, Michael Hoffmeister, Hermann Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Teresa SeumDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Rafael CardosoDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Joshua Stevenson-HoareDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Bernd HolleczekSaarland Cancer Registry, Präsident-Baltz-Strasse 5, Saarbrücken, 66119, Germany.
Ben SchöttkerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Michael HoffmeisterDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Hermann BrennerDivision of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany. h.brenner@dkfz-heidelberg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile metabolic pathway alterations are linked to colorectal cancer (CRC), the predictive value of pre-diagnostic metabolomic profiling in CRC risk assessment remains to be clarified. This study evaluated the predictive performance of a metabolomics risk panel (MRP) both independently and in combination with established risk factors.

methodsWe derived, internally validated (IV), and externally validated (EV) a metabolomics risk panel (MRP) for CRC from data of the UK Biobank (UKB) and the German ESTHER cohort. Baseline blood samples were assessed for 249 metabolites using nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy analysis. We applied LASSO Cox proportional hazards regression to identify metabolites for inclusion in the MRP and evaluated the model performance using the concordance index (C-index). We compared the performance of the MRP to an environmental risk panel (ERP; sex, age, body mass index, smoking status, and alcohol consumption) and a genetic risk panel (GRP; polygenic risk score).

resultsThe study included 154,892 participants of the UKB cohort (mean age at baseline 54.5 years; 55.5% female) with 1879 incident CRC and 3242 participants of the ESTHER cohort (mean age 61.5 years; 52.2% female) with 103 CRC cases. Twenty-three metabolites, primarily amino acid and lipid-related metabolites, were selected for the MRP, showing moderate predictive performance (C-index 0.60 [IV] and 0.54 [EV]). The ERP and GRP showed superior performance, with C-index values of 0.73 (IV) and 0.69 (EV). Adding the MRP to these risk models did not change the C-indices in both cohorts.

conclusionsGenetic and environmental risk information provided strong predictive accuracy for CRC risk, with no improvements from adding metabolomics data. These findings suggest that metabolomics data may have limited impact on enhancing established CRC risk models in clinical practice.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMetabolomicsAgedBiological Specimen BanksCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsUK BiobankUnited KingdomBiomarkersColorectal cancerMetabolomicsRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID40361100
PMCPMC12077020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.