ReviewBMC biotechnology2025
Metabolic engineering for microbial production of sugar acids.
Review in BMC biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential transcriptomic and metabolomic landscape between human hearts donated after cardiac vs brain death.The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation · 2026Article
- Comparing the Effect of Biochar and Poultry Manure on the Metabolomic Profile of Tomatoes (Metabolites · 2026Article
- A synergistic strategy of metabolic engineering and flocculation recycling for enhanced acetoin production inSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026Article
- A Study on the Stability and Carbohydrate Metabolic Traits of Starter Cultures in Response to Continuous Subculturing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Hierarchical metabolic engineering for rewiring cellular metabolism.FEMS microbiology reviews · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carbohydrates including sugar acids are commonly used as carbon sources in microbial biotechnology. These sugar acids are themselves desirable and often overlooked targets for biobased production since they find applications in a broad range of industries, examples include food, construction, medical, textile, and polymer industries. Different stages of oxidation for natural sugar acids can be distinguished. Oxidation of the aldehyde group yields aldonic acids, oxidation of the primary hydroxy group leads to uronic acids, and both oxidations combined yield aldaric acids. While the chemical oxidation of sugars to their acid forms often is a one-pot reaction under harsh conditions, their biosynthesis is much more delicate. Bio-based production can involve enzymatic conversion, whole-cell biotransformation, and fermentation. Generally, the in vivo approaches are preferred because they are less resource-intensive than enzymatic conversion. Metabolic engineering plays a crucial role in optimizing microbial strains for efficient sugar acid production. Strategies include pathway engineering to overexpress key enzymes involved in sugar oxidation, deletion of competing pathways to enhance the precursor availability and eliminate the product consumption, cofactor balancing for efficient redox reactions, and transporter engineering to facilitate precursor import or sugar acid export. Synthetic biology tools, such as CRISPR-Cas and dynamic regulatory circuits, have further improved strain development by enabling precise genetic modifications and adaptive control of metabolic fluxes. The usage of plant biomass hydrolysates for bio-based production further adds to the environmental friendliness of the in vivo approaches. This review highlights the different approaches for the production of C5 and C6 sugar acids, their applications, and their catabolism in microbes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.