ArticleBMC public health2025
Ready-to-eat food intake associates with PHQ-9-based depression in US adults: a cross-sectional study.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship between 39 dietary markers of ultra-processed food and incident depression: evidence from the prospective UK Biobank cohort study.European journal of nutrition · 2026Article
- Physical activity and depressive symptoms among college students: positive mental health as a mediator.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Weight Loss Strategies Associated With Type 2 Diabetes Duration: A Population-Based Optimal Intervention Window From the NHANES.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDepressive disorders are a contemporary global public health problem and amongst the leading causes of disability worldwide. Ready-to-eat foods require minimal preparation time and are designed to maximize consumer convenience while minimizing consumer efforts. Nutritional properties of ready-to-eat foods, such as their high saturated fat and sodium content, have been linked to depression. Studies from the United States (US) of America investigating the association between ready-to-eat food intake frequency and depression are scarce, although North America is currently the largest ready-to-eat food market.
methodsUsing crude and multivariate logistic regression models, this study explored potential associations between self-reported ready-to-eat food intake frequency and PHQ-9-based depression in US adults aged 20 years or older based on data from the cross-sectional National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2011-2018). Depression was assessed with the PHQ-9 questionnaire, a validated questionnaire and measure of reference in epidemiological depression research.
resultsData from n = 8,689 participants was analyzed. Participants with PHQ-9-based depression tended to be female, never married or separated and were characterized by a lower annual household income. Crude and adjusted multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed a significant association between ready-to-eat food intake frequency and depression. For each additional ready-to-eat food, the odds for PHQ-9-based depression increased by a factor of 1.014 (CI: 1.002-1.026; p = 0.022) after adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics. Compared to those who did not report any ready-to-eat foods, participants with an average intake frequency of ≥ 1 per day had a significantly higher likelihood of depression (OR: 2.02, CI: 1.18-3.43; p = 0.011) after adjustment for sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics.
conclusionsReady-to-eat food intake frequency is associated with PHQ-9-based depression in the NHANES. Given the high popularity of ready-to-eat foods in the US, these findings have important public health nutrition implications, and warrant additional research and targeted interventions to promote healthier meals sold by food outlets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.