ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
'This is like tradition, lie on your back, hold your leg, and push': understanding midwives' perspectives on their choice of labour positions in a Ugandan hospital.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDespite the well-documented benefits of upright positions and mobility during labour and childbirth, the adoption of these remains limited. Offering women choices in labour positions is essential for respectful maternity care. Since midwives play a pivotal role in guiding women through labour, their perspectives are crucial to the effective integration of these practices.
aimThe study aimed to understand midwives' perspectives and reasoning behind their choice of labour positions.
methodsThis qualitative study was conducted in a regional referral hospital in eastern Uganda. Twelve midwives were recruited purposively at two different time points in December 2020 and February 2024. A data-driven reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.
resultsMidwives' choice of labour positions was based on their understanding of the advantages and disadvantages for mothers and babies. Midwives were only open to changing their practices when they were confident in their knowledge and skills. The availability of resources influenced their perspectives on which positions were most feasible and effective in different situations. The midwives prioritised assessment of the mother's clinical condition rather than her preferences when choosing birth positions.
conclusionThis study highlighted midwives' willingness to support different and, to them, new labour positions when confident in their efficacy and safety. Addressing misconceptions about risks and equipment needs is therefore crucial. The prevailing provider-centric norms in hospitals may shape midwives' approach to care, highlighting the need for supportive environments to foster midwives' confidence in new practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.