Observational studyBMC geriatrics2025
Exploring in-hospital mobility practices for geriatric patients: insights from a mixed-method study.
Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06421246 (Physical Activity in Geriatric Patients Before and After the Introduction of a Staff-facing Real-time Activity Screen and Validation of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment - a Hybrid Implementation and Effectiveness Study in Two Patient Cohorts), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Physical Activity in Geriatric Patients Before and After the Introduction of a Staff-facing Real-time Activity Screen and Validation of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment - a Hybrid Implementation and Effectiveness Study in Two Patient Cohorts
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Assessment of Functioning and Disability Based on WHODAS 2.0 and Related Factors Among People Aged 80 and Over Hospitalized in a Geriatric Ward in Southeastern Poland.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2026Article
- Nurses' Behaviours and Implementation Factors Towards Promoting Mobility Among Hospitalized Older Adults in China: A Mixed Method Study.Nursing open · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is well-established that mobility is very limited among older hospitalized patients and associated with several negative outcomes. Therefore, this mixed-methods study aimed to quantify 24-hour mobility levels in acutely admitted older adults and simultaneously explore clinical practice with regards to mobilization and mobility through an ethnographic field study.
methodsOver a 6-week period, hospital mobility was assessed in 44 geriatric patients by SENS motion
resultsDuring hospitalization, the patients spent most of their time (22.8 h/per day) in sedentary behavior and only 1.2 h/per day in uptime (walking and standing), including 43 min walking, and took less than 1200 steps daily. The field study revealed that most staff consider mobilization and mobility important tasks. However, mobilizing patients to a chair and performing functional level assessments are prioritized over patient mobility. Also, the patients' perceived mobility opportunities are limited by the physical environment (e.g., congested hallways) and lack of purposeful activities to engage in.
conclusionsThis study found low levels of mobility in geriatric inpatients during hospitalization. While mobility is considered important, mobilization to a chair and functional assessments are prioritized over patient mobility, which becomes dependent on the patient's own initiative. Therefore, environmental adjustment, enhanced interprofessional collaboration, and targeted strategies for integrating mobility into daily care practices are warranted to enhance in-hospital mobility. ClincalTrials.Gov identifier NCT06421246.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.