Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40361036›Full record

Observational studyBMC geriatrics2025

Exploring in-hospital mobility practices for geriatric patients: insights from a mixed-method study.

Lea Kromann Johansen, Trine Schifter Larsen, Jeanette Wassar Kirk, Britt Staevnsbo Pedersen, Barbara Rubek Nielsen, Thomas Kallemose, Thomas Bandholm, Mette Merete Pedersen

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06421246 (Physical Activity in Geriatric Patients Before and After the Introduction of a Staff-facing Real-time Activity Screen and Validation of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment - a Hybrid Implementation and Effectiveness Study in Two Patient Cohorts), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06421246 completednot on this map

Physical Activity in Geriatric Patients Before and After the Introduction of a Staff-facing Real-time Activity Screen and Validation of the Danish Version of the Acute Care Mobility Assessment - a Hybrid Implementation and Effectiveness Study in Two Patient Cohorts

TypeobservationalSponsorCopenhagen University Hospital, HvidovreRan2024 to 2025Enrolled100ConditionsAcute Disease, Old AgeArmsStaff-facing screen
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lea Kromann JohansenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6238-4240
Trine Schifter LarsenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5410-7987
Jeanette Wassar KirkDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2680-0917
Britt Staevnsbo PedersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6694-6622
Barbara Rubek NielsenDepartment of Geriatrics, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-6544-8765
Thomas KallemoseDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7356-6481
Thomas BandholmDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6884-1971
Mette Merete PedersenDepartment of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital Amager and Hvidovre, Kettegård Alle 30, Hvidovre, 2650, Denmark. mette.merete.pedersen@regionh.dk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5719-2531

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIt is well-established that mobility is very limited among older hospitalized patients and associated with several negative outcomes. Therefore, this mixed-methods study aimed to quantify 24-hour mobility levels in acutely admitted older adults and simultaneously explore clinical practice with regards to mobilization and mobility through an ethnographic field study.

methodsOver a 6-week period, hospital mobility was assessed in 44 geriatric patients by SENS motion

resultsDuring hospitalization, the patients spent most of their time (22.8 h/per day) in sedentary behavior and only 1.2 h/per day in uptime (walking and standing), including 43 min walking, and took less than 1200 steps daily. The field study revealed that most staff consider mobilization and mobility important tasks. However, mobilizing patients to a chair and performing functional level assessments are prioritized over patient mobility. Also, the patients' perceived mobility opportunities are limited by the physical environment (e.g., congested hallways) and lack of purposeful activities to engage in.

conclusionsThis study found low levels of mobility in geriatric inpatients during hospitalization. While mobility is considered important, mobilization to a chair and functional assessments are prioritized over patient mobility, which becomes dependent on the patient's own initiative. Therefore, environmental adjustment, enhanced interprofessional collaboration, and targeted strategies for integrating mobility into daily care practices are warranted to enhance in-hospital mobility. ClincalTrials.Gov identifier NCT06421246.

Indexed as

HospitalizationInpatientsMobility LimitationWalkingAgedAged, 80 and overCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMale24-hour mobilityEthnographyGeriatric patientsHospitalizationMixed methods

Identifiers

PMID40361036
PMCPMC12070506

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.