SynthesisBMC public health2025
Cost-effectiveness of physical activity-oriented interventions for improving mental health: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Transdiagnostic Assessment of Mental Health and Sleep Registry: Protocol for a Cross-Sectional Study.Alpha psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
questionAre physical activity-oriented interventions for improving mental health conditions cost-effective? This study systematically identified and summarized published evidence on the cost-effectiveness of physical activity-oriented interventions for improving mental health conditions. STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS: We searched four databases (PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, PsychArticles, PsychINFO) for published studies (from any time and region) that (1) assessed physical activity-oriented interventions in mental health disorders, (2) undertook a full economic evaluation (and specifically cost-effectiveness analysis or cost-utility analysis), and (3) were in English. Data were extracted from included studies using a predetermined 32-item matrix using the Covidence software platform.
findingsSearch and screening resulted in 11 studies eligible for inclusion. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ranged from £119 to £152,822 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. Physical activity interventions, including group sessions, such as dance exercise and walking, or one-on-one support through telephone or web-based personalized support and guidance, were found to be cost-effective. However, over half of the interventions (55%) were considered to be not cost-effective.
conclusionsOur review found that the current evidence is insufficient to conclude whether physical activity-oriented interventions for mental health are a cost-effective when compared with the standard of care of other treatment types. Better designed studies focusing on specific mental health conditions and physical activity interventions that address cost-effectiveness analysis are warranted. Physical activity-oriented interventions for improving mental health should adopt low-cost implementation strategies and include behavioral economics components.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.