ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Workplace violence in the ambulance service from the offender's perspective: a qualitative study using trial transcripts.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Workplace violence from the ambulance personnel's perspective, a qualitative study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Article
- Reducing workplace violence in emergency medical services: a Finnish Delphi study to develop prevention guidelines.International journal of emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring violence towards EMS personnel: a multiprofessional qualitative study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Confronting workplace violence in emergency care: insights from global research.BMC emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundWorkplace violence is a widely recognised problem within the ambulance service context. The causes of workplace violence have often been attributed to patient- or situation-related risk factors. However, there is a lack of research on workplace violence from the offender's perspective.
aimTo explore workplace violence directed toward ambulance services from the offender's perspective.
methodsAn explorative qualitative study was conducted using inductive thematic analysis of trial transcripts from cases tried in court between 2013 and 2023. Plaintiffs in these cases were ambulance personnel or the ambulance service itself. Offenders were those convicted of committing or attempting any of the following acts: threats, theft, assault, molestation or murder.
resultsTwenty-three trial transcripts were analysed, and four themes were found: (I) the offender was misunderstood, which included communication problems and other misunderstandings; (II) the offender was disrespected, which described perceived unprofessional behaviour and unpleasant or painful treatment by ambulance personnel; (III) the offender was vulnerable, which described the state of the offender (i.e., being under the influence of alcohol or drugs); and (IV) the offender had unmet expectations, which included perceived unreasonable waiting time and conflicting expectations of ambulance care.
conclusionThe analysis of trial transcripts revealed four themes from the offender perspective: feelings of being misunderstood, disrespected, vulnerable, and having unmet expectations. It is important to view these results critically, as they are based on trial transcripts in which the offender was found guilty of a crime and may have been attempting to defend his or her actions during the trial. Despite this caveat, healthcare professionals need also to recognise that their behaviour may influence the risk of workplace violence. This knowledge can be harnessed to develop training programs for ambulance personnel.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.