ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025
Improving prediction accuracy of hospital arrival vital signs using a multi-output machine learning model: a retrospective study of JSAS-registry data.
Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCritically ill patients can deteriorate rapidly; therefore, prompt prehospital interventions and seamless transition to in-hospital care upon arrival are crucial for improving survival. In Japan, helicopter emergency medical services (HEMS) complement general emergency medical services (GEMS) by providing on-site care, reducing transport times, and aiding facility selection. Vital signs at hospital arrival determine initial management, but existing models are poor at predicting them, especially in patients receiving continuous interventions from both GEMS and HEMS. Therefore, we developed a machine-learning model to accurately predict the actual values of vital signs at hospital arrival using limited patient characteristic data and prehospital vital signs.
methodsUsing data from the Japanese Society for Aeromedical Services registry, we retrospectively analyzed data from patients aged ≥18 years transported by HEMS between April 2020 and March 2022. Patients with cardiac arrest during transport, missing vital signs, and data inconsistencies were excluded. The predictive model used prehospital vital signs from GEMS and HEMS contact times, demographic characteristics, and intervention information. The primary outcome was the actual values of vital signs measured at hospital arrival. After data preprocessing, we constructed a deep neural network multi-output regression model using Bayesian optimization. Model performance was assessed by comparing the predicted values with the actual hospital arrival measurements using mean absolute error, R² score, residual standard deviation, and Spearman's correlation coefficient. Additionally, the NN model's performance was compared with alternative methods, namely HEMS contact values and change-based predictions derived solely from prehospital data.
resultsThe study included 10,478 patients (median age 70 years; 69% male). The model achieved mean absolute errors of 7.1 bpm for heart rate, 15.7 mmHg for systolic blood pressure, 10.8 mmHg for diastolic blood pressure, 2.9 breaths/min for respiratory rate, and 0.62 points for Glasgow Coma Scale score. The Spearman's correlation coefficients ranged from 0.54 to 0.86. The model outperformed other methods, especially for R² scores and residual standard deviations, demonstrating its superior ability to predict actual vital signs values.
conclusionThe multi-output regression model accurately predicted the actual values of vital signs measured at hospital arrival using limited prehospital information, demonstrating the effectiveness of advanced modeling techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.