ReviewEuropean review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity2025
Effectiveness of exercise prescription variables to reduce fall risk among older adults: a meta-analysis.
Review in European review of aging and physical activity : official journal of the European Group for Research into Elderly and Physical Activity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Bone aging: a paradigm of multiscale degeneration and targeted rejuvenation.Bone research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis meta-analysis explored the relationship between various exercise prescription variables and their effects on fall risk reduction in older adults, enabling the selection of targeted and evidence-based intervention prescription variables tailored to individual risk-assessment results.
methodDatabases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials that investigated the impact of exercise intervention on fall prevention. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Meta-analyses, subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and assessments of publication bias were performed using Stata 16.0.
resultsA total of 43 articles comprising 51 studies and involving 2,743 participants were included. The results indicated significant improvements in fall risk assessment indices due to Mind-body Exercise (MBE), Multi-component Physical Activity (MCPA), and Muscle-strengthening Activity(MSA). Subgroup analyses revealed differential optimal type, cycle (week), frequency (day/week), and session time (minutes) across assessment tools, such as the unipedal stance test with eyes open (MCPA, < 8, 3, 45 ≤ Time < 60), functional reach (MCPA, < 8, < 3, ≥ 60), the "get-up and go" test (MSA, ≥ 24, < 3, 30 ≤ Time < 45), Berg balance scale (MBE, 8 ≤ Time < 12, 3, 30 ≤ Time < 45), Five stands sit-to-stand (MCPA, ≥ 24, > 3, 30 ≤ Time < 45), the 30-s chair-stand test (MSA, 12 ≤ Time, < 3, 45 ≤ Time < 60), short physical performance battery (MCPA, 12 ≤ Time < 24, < 3, ≥ 60), and Falls Efficacy Scale-International (MBE, 8 ≤ Time < 12, < 3, 45 ≤ Time < 60).
conclusionThe findings suggest that prescription variables combining MCPA and MBE, ≥ 8-week programs, and ≥ 30-min sessions, effectively reduce fall risk through concurrent enhancement of balance, strength, and self-efficacy; their integration into community-based protocols with individualized resistance-balance combinations optimizes functional outcomes in older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.