Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360975›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2025

Social frailty in community-dwelling older adults: a scoping review.

Cuiting Huang, Wachiranun Sirikul, Nida Buawangpong

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cuiting HuangDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.
Wachiranun SirikulDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand. wachiranun.sir@gmail.com.
Nida BuawangpongDepartment of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, 50200, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe rising global population of older adults has increased attention on social frailty, significantly affecting physical, cognitive, and mental health.

objectivesThis review systematically examines social frailty in community-dwelling older adults by exploring theoretical frameworks, measurement tools, determinants, health outcomes, and potential interventions.

methodsA scoping review following PRISMA-ScR guidelines was conducted with searches across PubMed, Embase, and CINAHL databases, covering studies up to November 4, 2024. Of the 2371 articles, 42 were included in the synthesis. The review focused on community-dwelling older adults aged 60 and above, aiming to understand the role of social frailty in this population's health and well-being.

resultsThe findings revealed that social frailty is a complex, multidimensional phenomenon determined by physical function decline, cognitive impairment, and depression. It is also linked to adverse outcomes, including increased risks of cognitive decline, depression, disabilities, and mortality. The growing evidence underscores the need for targeted interventions to disrupt the cycle of worsening frailty. The variability in existing measurement tools, limiting their broad applicability, suggested a need for standardization and cross-cultural validation. We identified potential intervention strategies, including multicomponent physical exercise, social networking enhancement, and digital health interventions, but only one RCT specifically examined a robotic pet intervention targeting social frailty, and its findings were not significant.

conclusionSocial frailty measurement tools are based on two primary frameworks: one grounded in the Deficit Accumulation Model, suited for secondary data analysis and prospective or periodic screening, and the other based on the Social Needs Fulfillment Theory, which uses brief-item tools but requires validation in specific contexts. Social frailty is associated with increased morbidity and mortality among community-dwelling older adults. The studies employed physical workouts, social networking, and digital health interventions, showed a significant improvement in social engagement. However, none specifically aimed at reducing social frailty, underscoring the urgent need for the specific interventions and management for social frailty.

Indexed as

Frail ElderlyFrailtyIndependent LivingAgedAged, 80 and overCognitive DysfunctionDepressionGeriatric AssessmentHumansCommunity-dwelling older adultsHealth outcomesMeasurementsScoping reviewSocial frailty

Identifiers

PMID40360975
PMCPMC12070721

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.