Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360963›Full record

ArticleCJEM2025

Validating the falls decision rule: optimizing head CT use in older adults with ground-level falls.

Emre Kudu, Mustafa Altun, Faruk Danış, Sinan Karacabey, Erkman Sanri, Arzu Denizbasi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06525727 (External Validation of the Falls Decision Rule to Exclude Intracranial Bleeding Without Head CT in Geriatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With A Fall), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06525727 completednot on this map

External Validation of the Falls Decision Rule to Exclude Intracranial Bleeding Without Head CT in Geriatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With A Fall

TypeobservationalSponsorMarmara UniversityRan2024 to 2024Enrolled800ConditionsIntracranial HemorrhagesArmsFalls Decision Rule
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emre KuduDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Fevzi Çakmak Mahallesi, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey. dr.emre.kudu@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0002-1422-5927
Mustafa AltunDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Fevzi Çakmak Mahallesi, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7090-8917
Faruk DanışDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University Medical School, Bolu, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8722-5402
Sinan KaracabeyDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Fevzi Çakmak Mahallesi, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5479-5118
Erkman SanriDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Fevzi Çakmak Mahallesi, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-7108-3304
Arzu DenizbasiDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Marmara University School of Medicine, Fevzi Çakmak Mahallesi, Muhsin Yazıcıoğlu Caddesi, Pendik, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-4589-8251

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveFalls are a leading cause of traumatic brain injury in older adults, with ground-level falls being the most common mechanism. Despite the increasing use of head computed tomography (CT) in older adults with ground-level falls, there is an ongoing debate regarding the necessity of routine neuroimaging in all cases. The falls decision rule was developed to safely exclude clinically important intracranial bleeding without head CT in older adults. This study aims to validate the falls decision rule externally and assess its accuracy in identifying low-risk patients while reducing unnecessary imaging.

methodsThis prospective cohort study at a Level-1 trauma center enrolled consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 years presenting within 48 h of a ground-level fall. Patient management, including the decision to perform head CT, was determined independently by the treating emergency physician. Patients were followed up for 42 days to identify clinically important intracranial bleeding cases. The rule's diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using 95% confidence intervals (CI).

resultsA total of 800 patients were included, with a median age of 78 years (IQR 72-85), and 59.9% were female. Clinically important intracranial bleeding was identified in 6.1% (n = 49) of patients. Head CT was performed in 67.6% of cases, identifying 43 initial hemorrhages, with six additional cases detected during follow-ups. The falls decision rule demonstrated 97.9% sensitivity (95% CI 89.1-99.9), 31.9% specificity (95% CI 28.6-35.4), and 99.5% negative predictive value (95% CI 97.1-99.9), potentially reducing CTs by one-third.

conclusionThis validation confirms the falls decision rule's high sensitivity and negative predictive value for identifying low-risk older adults after ground-level falls, potentially reducing unnecessary CT scans by approximately one-third. This approach could alleviate ED overcrowding and resource strain while ensuring diagnostic safety.

Indexed as

Accidental FallsClinical Decision RulesTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleProspective StudiesTrauma CentersClinical decision ruleComputed tomographyFalls ruleFrailtyGeriatricsIntracranial bleeding

Identifiers

PMID40360963
PMCPMC12380872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.