ArticleCJEM2025
Validating the falls decision rule: optimizing head CT use in older adults with ground-level falls.
Article in CJEM, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06525727 (External Validation of the Falls Decision Rule to Exclude Intracranial Bleeding Without Head CT in Geriatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With A Fall), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
External Validation of the Falls Decision Rule to Exclude Intracranial Bleeding Without Head CT in Geriatric Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department With A Fall
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rater Dependence in Emergency Department Catheter-Appropriateness Audits: A Prospective Three-Rater Study of Item-Level Reliability.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Prediction of 30-Day Complicated Clinical Course in Acute Pulmonary Embolism: A Prospective Cohort Comparison of the ESC, Bova, and Modified FAST Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Limited Predictability of Traumatic Intracranial Hemorrhage from Routine Pre-CT Clinical Variables in Older Adults with Low-Energy Falls: A Systematic Benchmarking Study in a Retrospective Bicentric Cohort.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Risk stratification for significant acute traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in older adults after a ground-level fall: A prospective multicentre cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Intracranial lesion yield and downstream management after mild traumatic brain injury in emergency department patients receiving antiplatelet therapy: a two-center retrospective cohort study.BMC emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Impact of Initial Chest CT Findings on the Clinical Course and Hospitalization in Patients With Acute Drug Poisoning.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Applying the Canadian Head CT Criteria to Older Adults Seen in the Emergency Department After a Fall.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2026Article
- Article
- CT Brain Utilization After Low-Risk Head Injury in Adults: A Retrospective Cohort Study and Literature Review.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveFalls are a leading cause of traumatic brain injury in older adults, with ground-level falls being the most common mechanism. Despite the increasing use of head computed tomography (CT) in older adults with ground-level falls, there is an ongoing debate regarding the necessity of routine neuroimaging in all cases. The falls decision rule was developed to safely exclude clinically important intracranial bleeding without head CT in older adults. This study aims to validate the falls decision rule externally and assess its accuracy in identifying low-risk patients while reducing unnecessary imaging.
methodsThis prospective cohort study at a Level-1 trauma center enrolled consecutive patients aged ≥ 65 years presenting within 48 h of a ground-level fall. Patient management, including the decision to perform head CT, was determined independently by the treating emergency physician. Patients were followed up for 42 days to identify clinically important intracranial bleeding cases. The rule's diagnostic performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values using 95% confidence intervals (CI).
resultsA total of 800 patients were included, with a median age of 78 years (IQR 72-85), and 59.9% were female. Clinically important intracranial bleeding was identified in 6.1% (n = 49) of patients. Head CT was performed in 67.6% of cases, identifying 43 initial hemorrhages, with six additional cases detected during follow-ups. The falls decision rule demonstrated 97.9% sensitivity (95% CI 89.1-99.9), 31.9% specificity (95% CI 28.6-35.4), and 99.5% negative predictive value (95% CI 97.1-99.9), potentially reducing CTs by one-third.
conclusionThis validation confirms the falls decision rule's high sensitivity and negative predictive value for identifying low-risk older adults after ground-level falls, potentially reducing unnecessary CT scans by approximately one-third. This approach could alleviate ED overcrowding and resource strain while ensuring diagnostic safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.