ArticleSurgical endoscopy2025
Risk factors associated with hiatal hernia: a retrospective study and two-sample Mendelian randomization.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diagnostic value of real-time dynamic gastric contrast ultrasound for hiatal hernia.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2026Article
- Prehabilitation in Obese Patients with Ventral Hernia: A Narrative Review and Proposal of a Clinical Algorithm.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Large Hiatal Hernia in a Patient With Bulimia Nervosa and Obesity: An Interdisciplinary Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThe existing literature has demonstrated that variables such as gender, body mass index (BMI), and age play a significant role in the risk assessment of hiatal hernia. This study aims to comprehensively investigate the association between these risk factors and hiatal hernia through a retrospective analysis and Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis.
methodsIn this study, the examination results and basic information of 685 patients who underwent routine esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) at the gastroesophageal Reflux Center of Xuanwu Hospital from 2018 to 2024 were retrospectively collected. logistic regression was used to analyze the potential risk factors. Meanwhile, a two-sample MR analysis was used to further validate and supplement these risk factors.
resultsA retrospective study showed that the incidence of hiatal hernia diagnosed by endoscopy was 28.7%, in the population without GERD, the incidence was 22.8%In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, male sex (P = 0.033), age (P < 0.001), heavy physical labor (P < 0.001), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (P < 0.001) were independent risk factors for hiatal hernia, while an increase in BMI, smoking, alcohol consumption, and the number of pregnancies and deliveries in women were not statistically significant. The inverse variance weighting (IVW) results of the MR analysis showed that an increased waist-hip ratio (OR
conclusionThis study showed that male gender, age, heavy physical labor, and GERD were independent risk factors for hiatal hernia. MR analysis showed that abdominal obesity and smoking may be genetically associated with hiatal hernia. However, there was no statistical significance between increased BMI and hiatal hernia in multivariate analysis and MR analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.