ArticleJournal of religion and health2025
Perceptions and Attitudes of Muslims in Israel When Using Porcine-Based Organs in Transplantation Procedures.
Article in Journal of religion and health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Public awareness and acceptance of xenotransplantation in China: a cross-sectional survey.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Porcine-derived organ transplants may arouse resistance due to Muslim religious prohibitions against consuming pork products. However, according to Sharia, pork is permitted for life-saving purposes. We performed a cross-sectional study among 884 Israeli Muslims aged 18-81 years with different levels of religious observance, socioeconomic status, and education to assess the knowledge and attitudes of Muslims regarding porcine xenotransplantation according to the Islamic perspective. We used an online questionnaire that was posted on social media. Our findings demonstrated that Muslims were unaware of what is permitted by Islam. Thus, we offer recommendations for improving the informed consent process with Muslim patients. We believe that the findings of our study will be used as an evidence-based source for deliberations among physicians, religious leaders, and theologians to promote knowledge in members of their religions and, no less importantly, the cultural competence of medical and nursing staff with respect for the autonomy of any patient.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.