Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360870›Full record

ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2025

Theoretical considerations of the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator Assessment Framework.

Dario Torre, Paul A Hemmer, Steven J Durning, Louis N Pangaro

Abstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dario TorreUniversity of Central Florida College of Medicine, Orlando, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4924-4888
Paul A HemmerDepartment of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1559-015X
Steven J DurningDepartment of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5223-1597
Louis N PangaroDepartment of Medicine, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA. louis.pangaro@usuhs.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5221-3161

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

issueThe Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator assessment framework provides a concise approach to observing learner progress in clinical settings. Despite its widespread use and study, its theoretical underpinnings remain unexplored. EVIDENCE: We identify two key principles and concepts of the Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator (RIME) framework and their underlying theoretical explanations for it. (1) Categorization and prototype theory: RIME allows categorization of the learner, using previously internalized prototypes belonging to a "category membership" (Reporter-Interpreter-Manager/Educator; Story-Observations-Assessment-Plan) which depend on pattern recognition. (2) Theories of cognitive development enabling its "developmental" perspective: the progress of roles in RIME is a series of zone of proximal development (ZPD) challenges in which the teacher and learner identify boundaries of the ZPD, recognize the gap between the actual and the potential development, and provide specific recommendations to foster learners' advancement. Similarly, in a community of practice, learners progress from peripheral to full participation within their community and engage in a meaningful learning process. IMPLICATIONS: RIME is a theory-based framework facilitating the assessment of learners in the clinical setting. RIME's theoretical tenets facilitate its use to navigate current tensions in assessment, while offering insights into its integration with other assessment models and theoretical frameworks.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementHumansLearning

Identifiers

PMID40360870
PMCPMC12405122

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.