Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360867›Full record

SynthesisClinical and experimental medicine2025

Haematological toxicities with immune checkpoint inhibitors in digestive system tumors: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xinpu Han, Jing Xu, Meichen Cui, Zhangjun Yun, Hongbin Zhao, Shaodan Tian, Suicai Mi, Li Hou

Abstract readSystematic ReviewNetwork Meta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Hematologic immune-related adverse effects of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Review
  8. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Xinpu Han *Department of Oncology and Hematology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Jing Xu *Hubei Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hubei, China.
Meichen Cui *Department of Oncology and Hematology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Zhangjun YunDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Hongbin ZhaoDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Shaodan TianDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China.
Suicai MiXiamen Hospital, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Xiamen, China. mihecai123@163.com.
Li HouDepartment of Oncology and Hematology, Dongzhimen Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, China. houli1203@126.com.

Funding

Clinical Research Operations of Centralized High-level Chinese Medicine Hospitals CZ015Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality 7242236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the hematologic toxicity profiles, toxicity spectrum, and safety rankings of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) used for digestive system tumors. The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were systematically searched from inception to August 2024 to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The primary outcome was anemia, while secondary outcomes included neutropenia, neutrophil count decreased, thrombocytopenia, platelet count decreased, leukopenia, white blood cell (WBC) count decreased, lymphocyte count decreased, and febrile neutropenia (FN). Subgroup analyses were performed based on tumor type, country category, study phase, ICI regimen, control group, chemotherapy regimen, ICI plus different chemotherapy regimens. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data according to pre-specified criteria, and assessed the risk of bias using the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. RevMan 5.4 software was utilized to visualize the risk of bias assessments. Stata 16.0 was used to conduct network meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis and meta-regression. 25 phase II and III RCTs (n = 15216) were included. The general safety of ICIs ranked from high to low for grade 1-5 anemia were as follows: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, camrelizumab, and tislelizumab. For grade 3-5 anemia, the general safety profile of the ICIs were as follows, from highest to lowest: avelumab, nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, and camrelizumab. Compared to chemotherapy, treatment-related hematologic toxicities with ICIs occurred primarily in grade 1-5 anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, and WBC count decreased. Taking ICI monotherapy, nivolumab plus ipilimumab were generally safer than taking chemotherapy, one ICI drug with chemotherapy, or two ICI drugs with chemotherapy. In terms of grade 1-5 hematologic toxicities, tislelizumab had the highest risk of neutropenia and leukopenia; the primary treatment-adverse events (AEs) for sintilimab was neutrophil count decreased and WBC count decreased; the primary treatment-related AE associated with nivolumab was platelet count decreased; camrelizumab posed the highest risk for lymphocyte count decreased. In terms of grade 3-5 hematologic toxicities, pembrolizumab was predominantly linked to neutropenia; sintilimab showed the greatest risk for neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased, and lymphocyte count decreased; avelumab was most associated with WBC count decreased. FN primarily manifested as grade 3-5, with camrelizumab having the highest risk. Among agents used in gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer, avelumab demonstrated the most favorable safety profile for anemia. Each treatment regimen has its unique safety profile. Early identification and management of ICI-related hematologic toxicities are essential in clinical practice.Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO CRD42024571508.

Indexed as

Digestive System NeoplasmsHematologic DiseasesImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsDigestive system tumorsHaematological toxicitiesImmune checkpoint inhibitorsNetwork meta-analysisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID40360867
PMCPMC12075026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.