ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025
The sequential categorization-identification paradigm (SCIP): A paradigm for the concurrent testing of strong hypotheses regarding psychological representation and processing.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Temporal processes of information transmission from visual search to behavior.Journal of vision · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We present a new experimental paradigm intended to allow for the acquisition of the data needed for testing strong hypotheses regarding the nature of encoded representations and the real-time processing of those representations using the same set of trials. The design is motivated by two formal theories: general recognition theory (Ashby & Townsend. Psychological Review, 93, 154-179, 1986), which addresses internal representation, and systems factorial theory (Townsend & Nozawa. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 39, 321-359. 1995), which addresses the foundational characteristics of real-time processing. We show in the results of two experiments, one with very simple and a second with more complex stimuli, that this paradigm is capable of producing data that can allow for inferences regarding both representation and processing from the same set of trials and that those two sets of inferences can be found to be coherent with one another, allowing for the potential for the results of behavioral experimentation to seriously constrain formal and computational modeling. In this sense, the work is coherent with an overarching theme in Mary Peterson's work, specifically as an application of two theory-driven approaches to questions in cognitive representation and processing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
40360866What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.