ArticleUpdates in surgery2025
Risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage in obstructive left colonic carcinoma.
Article in Updates in surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on: Risk factors for postoperative anastomotic leakage in obstructive left colonic carcinoma.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Deep learning and body composition model for predicting postoperative complications in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in medical technology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anastomotic leakage (AL) is one of the most severe complications of colon carcinoma surgery. This study aims to investigate the related factors of AL and evaluate the independent risk factors in predicting AL after one-stage resection and primary anastomosis (RPA) for obstructive left colonic carcinoma (OLCC) patients. The demographic and clinical data, intra-operative indexes, pathologic characteristics, and ileocecal valve status shown on CT of the patients with OLCC who submitted to one-stage RPA were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into AL group and no AL group. All indexes of the two groups were compared and the independent risk factors for AL were investigated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to explore the ability of the statistically significant parameters to predict AL. A total of 141 patients (AL group, 15; no AL group, 126) were enrolled. There were no statistical differences in these indexes between the two groups except for BMI (P = 0.001), ALB (P = 0.020), lymphatic metastasis (P = 0.027), and ileocecal valve status (P < 0.001). BMI, ALB, and ileocecal valve status shown on CT were the independent risk factors for AL. A BMI and ALB cutoff value of 22.2 kg/m
Indexed as
Identifiers
40360804What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.