SynthesisNeuropsychology review2026
Always Getting Lost: Defining Developmental Topographical Disorientation (DTD)-A Systematic Literature Review.
Synthesis in Neuropsychology review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Virtual Reality-Based Orienteering Training Improves Spatial Memory in College Students with Operationally Defined DTD-like Navigational Difficulties: fNIRS Correlates of Training-Related Cortical Adaptation.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- No Association Between Face Recognition and Spatial Navigation: Evidence from Developmental Prosopagnosia and Super-Recognizers.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Developmental topographical disorientation (DTD) refers to a condition of highly impaired navigation ability in healthy individuals. DTD often leads to severe consequences in daily life, affecting education and professional choices and limited everyday mobility. Since its first description in 2009, a substantial number of empirical studies on DTD have appeared, but a clear clinical definition of DTD that can be used to develop a behavioral assessment tool is not yet available. The aim of the current study was to shed more light on the precise behavioral characteristics of DTD by examining the empirical evidence available to date. Recent theoretical developments that enable the classification of navigation impairment in various populations are utilized in the current work. Through a systematic literature review, reported descriptions and criteria for DTD were identified. Furthermore, tests included and performance of people with DTD are classified in the different navigation domains relevant to navigation impairment (landmark knowledge; location knowledge, egocentric and allocentric; and path knowledge, route and survey). A total of 15 empirical papers were included in the analyses, each discussing performance of people with DTD in large-scale spatial tasks. Initial DTD descriptions focused on mental map quality, whereas later work adheres to a more general definition of impaired navigation. Performance patterns show that the navigation impairment in DTD is largely attributable to low mental map quality, as low performance is primarily found for tasks measuring allocentric location knowledge and path knowledge. In contrast, landmark knowledge remains largely unaffected and, if impaired, appears to also include face recognition impairment, suggesting a more general form of visual agnosia. Egocentric location knowledge is often not included in assessments. The outcomes support the initial focus on poor mental map quality as the key characteristic of DTD, combined with a landmark-focused navigation strategy. The current findings therefore provide relevant input to the development of a clinical characterization of DTD and the development of appropriate assessment tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.