Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360750›Full record

ReviewCommunications biology2025

Zebrafishology, study design guidelines for rigorous and reproducible data using zebrafish.

Victoria M Bedell, Priya Dubey, Han B Lee, Dondra S Bailey, Jennifer L Anderson, Allison Jamieson-Lucy, Rui Xiao, Elvin V Leonard, Marni J Falk, Michael A Pack and 4 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Evaluating the Validity of Model Organisms: A Review and a New Framework for Biologists.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Zebrafish: A Versatile and Powerful Model for Biomedical Research.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2025
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Victoria M BedellDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA. bedellv@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8959-6431
Priya DubeyDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Han B LeeDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6633-966X
Dondra S BaileyDepartment of Natural Sciences, Coppin State University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Jennifer L AndersonDepartment of Embryology, Carnegie Institution for Science, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Allison Jamieson-LucyDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Rui XiaoDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2727-8171
Elvin V LeonardDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Marni J FalkMitochondrial Medicine Frontier Program, Division of Human Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael A PackDepartment of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Mary MullinsDepartment of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Steven A FarberDepartment of Biology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Roderic G EckenhoffDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Stephen C EkkerDepartment of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0726-4212

Funding

Translational Research Support CoreP30ES013508 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI A. Clementina Mesaros · 2006 to 2026
$35.3M
University of Pennsylvania Postdoctoral Opportunities in Research and TeachingK12GM081259 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Janis K. Burkhardt · 2007 to 2026
$20.1M
Identifying genes required for digestive physiology and lipid metabolismR01DK093399 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI STEVEN A FARBER, John F Rawls · 2013 to 2026
$7.6M
Integrative mechanisms of organelle dynamics from the atomic-to-cellular levelRM1GM136511 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DOMINGUEZ, ROBERTO, HOLZBAUR, ERIKA L · 2020 to 2024
$7.4M
Mitochondrial respiratory chain disease mechanistic and therapeutic modelingR35GM134863 · NIGMS · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI MARNI J FALK · 2020 to 2026
$4.3M
Physician Postdoctoral Research Training in Perioperative Medicine (PPRTPM)T32GM112596 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Roderic G Eckenhoff, Max Kelz · 2015 to 2026
$3.4M
In vivo HTS assay for novel modulators of Apolipoprotien BR01DK116079 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FARBER, STEVEN A · 2018 to 2022
$3.2M
Foundation for Anesthesia Education and Research (FAER) MRTGNational Science Foundation (NSF) 2300505NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK093399NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK116079NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES013508NIGMS NIH HHS K12 GM081259NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM134863NIGMS NIH HHS RM1 GM136511U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01-GM063904U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01-GM120762U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R24-OD020166U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R35-GM131908U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R35-GM134863U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) T32 GM 112596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The zebrafish (Danio rerio) is one of the most widely used research model organisms funded by the United States' National Institutes of Health, second only to the mouse. Here, we discuss the advantages and unique qualities of this model organism. Additionally, we discuss key aspects of experimental design and statistical approaches that apply to studies using the zebrafish model organism. Finally, we list critical details that should be considered in the design of zebrafish experiments to enhance rigor and data reproducibility. These guidelines are designed to aid new researchers, journal editors, and manuscript reviewers in supporting the publication of the highest-quality zebrafish research.

Indexed as

Guidelines as TopicModels, AnimalResearch DesignZebrafishAnimalsReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID40360750
PMCPMC12075475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.