Observational studyScientific reports2025
A cohort study evaluating myocardial work and right ventricle strain in sepsis in critical care.
Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy and Cardiac Arrhythmias: Pathophysiology and Implications for Novel Therapeutic Approaches.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- From Fluid Responsiveness to Prognosis: The Emerging Role of Point-of-Care Echocardiography in Sepsis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Sepsis and the Heart: In the Quest for Noninvasive Pressure-Volume Loops at the Bedside.Critical care explorations · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The understanding of sepsis-related changes in myocardial function is evolving. This single-centre prospective observational cohort pilot study evaluated myoCardial work and Right ventricle Strain In Sepsis (CRiSIS) with 30-day mortality in critical care patients. Measurements were recorded for 32 patients on days 1 and 3 of admission: 22 (69%) survivors and 10 (31%) non-survivors at 30 days. Survivors demonstrated a higher global work efficiency (GWE; 94%, IQR 91-96%) compared to non-survivors (88.5%, IQR 85-92%; p = 0.02, BF
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.