Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360691›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Enhancing CO

Ahmed El-Sayed Saqr, Mohamed S Saraya, El-Sayed M El-Kenawy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ahmed El-Sayed SaqrComputer Engineering and Control Systems Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt. a7mdsqr@std.mans.edu.eg.
Mohamed S SarayaComputer Engineering and Control Systems Department, Faculty of Engineering, Mansoura University, Mansoura, 35516, Egypt.
El-Sayed M El-KenawyDepartment of Communications and Electronics, Delta Higher Institute of Engineering and Technology, Mansoura, 35111, Egypt. sayed.kenawy@dhiet.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electric vehicle (EV) [Formula: see text] emissions should be predicted and mitigated, which requires lowering EV emissions in line with global sustainability goals. Such accurate forecasting supports policymakers and other industry stakeholders make marketing decisions to reduce environmental impacts and optimize resource utilization. In this research, a novel Greylag Goose Optimization (GGO) algorithm is integrated with a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) model to improve [Formula: see text] emissions prediction. Finally, the study does a comparative analysis with some established optimization algorithms in hyperparameter tuning regarding an improved accuracy model. In addition, statistical analyses such as ANOVA, sensitivity analysis, and T-test were used to substantiate performance differentiation between models. For the optimal model, the GGO-optimized MLP significantly outperformed baseline models and other optimization techniques, having minimum error metrics such as correlation coefficient and RMSE and an MSE of [Formula: see text]. As a result, the emissions forecast is very reliable. The proposed approach provides actionable insights for environmental policies, EV adoption strategies, and infrastructure planning. The model enables stakeholders to achieve climate objectives, optimize EV charging systems and foster the creation of sustainable transportation systems, as said accurate emissions estimates are enabled.

Indexed as

Electric vehicles (EVs)[Formula: see text] emissions predictionGreylag Goose Optimization (GGO)Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)Sustainable transportation

Identifiers

PMID40360691
PMCPMC12075672

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.