Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360685›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Microbial diversity of high-elevated fumarole fields, low-biomass communities on the boundary between ice and fire.

Alla Yu Shevchenko, Gleb I Ursalov, Natalya I Eromasova, Pavel V Shelyakin, Mikhail S Gelfand, Maria N Tutukina, Andrey A Abramov, Tatiana A Vishnivetskaya, Elizaveta M Rivkina

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alla Yu ShevchenkoCenter for Molecular and Cellular Biology, Moscow, Russia. shevch2009@yahoo.com.
Gleb I UrsalovVoronezh State University, Voronezh, Russia.
Natalya I EromasovaInstitute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, PSCBR RAS, Pushchino, Russia.
Pavel V ShelyakinVavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
Mikhail S GelfandCenter for Molecular and Cellular Biology, Moscow, Russia.
Maria N TutukinaCenter for Molecular and Cellular Biology, Moscow, Russia.
Andrey A AbramovInstitute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, PSCBR RAS, Pushchino, Russia.
Tatiana A VishnivetskayaDepartment of Microbiology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Elizaveta M RivkinaInstitute of Physicochemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, PSCBR RAS, Pushchino, Russia.

Funding

Institute of Physical-Chemical and Biological Problems in Soil Science, Russian Federation FMRM-2022-0009Russian Science Foundation RSF 24-14-00276 (MSG)Vavilov Institute of General Genetics, Russian Federation № FFRW-2022-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fumarole fields on active volcanoes are habitats that host unique microbial ecosystems. However, DNA extraction from them for further analysis is rather challenging. In this study, we compared two different ways of sample homogenization for DNA extraction to further profile the microbial communities of active fumarolic fields from Elbrus and Ushkovsky volcanoes and the frozen fumarole deposits of Fujiyama. Vertical homogenizer gave significantly higher DNA concentrations for the Elbrus samples, and more archaeal amplicon sequence variants for Elbrus and Ushkovsky samples compared to the horizontal one. This suggests that vertical homogenizer might be preferable for DNA extraction from sandy and rocky soils. Independent of the homogenizer type, the dominant phyla for Elbrus were Acidobacteriota and Pseudomonadota, and Crenarchaeota for Ushkovsky. The bacterial community of Fuji was less diverse, with Actinomycetota, Pseudomonadota and Bacillota being the dominant phyla. Thus, the studied fumaroles showed distinct microbial profiles, revealing unique adaptations to their respective extreme environments. Within the fungal community, Ascomycota, Basidiomycota and Chytridiomycota were the most dominant phyla for all three volcanoes, but their abundance varied. This study offers the first comprehensive analysis of microbial and fungal communities of active and frozen fumarolic fields, and demonstrates that the choice of methodology can significantly influence the understanding of microbial diversity in extreme environments.

Indexed as

MicrobiotaSoil MicrobiologyArchaeaBacteriaBiodiversityBiomassFiresFungiIceVolcanic EruptionsIceDNAFumaroleHomogenizationMicrobial community

Identifiers

PMID40360685
PMCPMC12075824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.