ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimized SVR with nature-inspired algorithms for environmental modelling of mycotoxins in food virtual-water samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- High-precision prediction method for mine deformation based on GNSS RTK and stacking ensemble learning.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Deep learning framework for mapping nitrate pollution in coastal aquifers under land use pressure.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The accurate determination of mycotoxins in food samples is crucial to guarantee food safety and minimize their toxic effects on human and animal health. This study proposed the use of a support vector regression (SVR) predictive model improved by two metaheuristic algorithms used for optimization namely, Harris Hawks Optimization (HHO) and Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to predict chromatographic retention time of various food mycotoxin groups. The dataset was collected from secondary sources and used to train and validate the SVR-HHO and SVR-PSO models. The performance of the models was assessed via mean square error, correlation coefficient, and Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency. The SVR-HHO model outperformed existing methods by 4-7% in both the two learning (training and testing) phases respectively. By using metaheuristic optimization, parameter adjustment became more effective, avoiding trapping in local minima and improving model generalization. These results demonstrate how machine learning and metaheuristics may be combined to accurately forecast mycotoxin levels, providing a useful tool for regulatory compliance and food safety monitoring. The SVR-HHO framework is perfect for commercial quality assurance, regulatory testing, and extensive food safety programs because it provides exceptional accuracy and resilience in predicting mycotoxin retention times. In contrast to conventional models, SVR-HHO effectively manages intricate nonlinear interactions, guaranteeing accurate mycotoxin identification and improving food safety while lowering hazards to human and animal health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.