ArticleScientific reports2025
Comparison of trabeculotomy ab externo outcomes between resident physicians and supervising ophthalmologists using propensity score matching.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the surgical performance of resident doctors and their supervising ophthalmic surgeons in trabeculotomy (LOT) ab externo using propensity score matching. We retrospectively analyzed surgical data on 248 eyes that underwent LOT ab externo at our hospital between April 2016 and December 2022. The procedures were performed by three full-time supervising ophthalmologists (≥ 5 years of experience) and 12 resident physicians (< 5 years of experience). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for significant variables identified through univariate analysis of five covariates: preoperative visual acuity, preoperative intraocular pressure [IOP], preoperative ophthalmoscopy score, presence of preoperative pseudophakia, and concomitant cataract surgery. Postoperative outcomes including IOP, eye drop scores, and complications, were evaluated at 3-month intervals up to 24 months. Survival curves showed no significant difference between the eyes operated by resident physicians and those by supervising ophthalmologists (P = 0.183). The median change in IOP (first quartile-third quartile) was also comparable between the two groups (P = 0.234). Furthermore, both groups had similar rates of anterior chamber hemorrhage and transient IOP elevation (P = 0.577 and 0.85, respectively). These findings suggest that resident physicians can achieve surgical outcomes and complication rates comparable to those of their supervising ophthalmic surgeons when performing LOT ab externo.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.