Impact of two nano-pesticide formulations in combating the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch, and their residues in cucumber fruits, Cucumis sativus L.

Al-Kazafy Hassan Sabry, Rania Mohamed Ahmed Helmy, Rasha Ahmed Sleem, Shaker Mohamed Abolmaaty, Aziza Hassan Mohamady

Abstract read

In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it

0cells of the map it votes in

0citing papers in PubMed

–field-weighted citation impact

1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Al-Kazafy Hassan SabryPests and Plant Protection Department, National Research Centre, Cairo, Egypt. kazafysabry@yahoo.com.

Rania Mohamed Ahmed HelmyPesticide Residue and Environmental Pollution Department, Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

Rasha Ahmed SleemBioassay Research Department, Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

Shaker Mohamed AbolmaatyCentral Laboratory for Agriculture Climate, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

Aziza Hassan MohamadyBioassay Research Department, Central Agricultural Pesticides Laboratory, Agricultural Research Center, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nano-pesticides aim to improve the efficacy and safety of conventional pesticides, but as they are still in the early stages of development, data about their environmental fate is insufficient. Therefore, the aim of this study is to compare between the conventional and nano-formulations of chlorfenapyr (CF) and emamectin benzoate (EB), by using chitosan nanoparticles as carriers and evaluating it against the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae Koch. The loading capacities were 52.2 and 41.7%, respectively. The nanoparticles sizes of both chlorfenapyr (CF NPs) and emamectin benzoate (EB NPs) were 99.86 and 78.82 nm, respectively. The LC

Indexed as

Cucumis sativusNanoparticlesPesticide ResiduesTetranychidaeAcaricidesAnimalsChitosanFruitIvermectinPyrethrinsAcaricidesChitosanchlorfenapyremamectin benzoateIvermectinPesticide ResiduesPyrethrinsChlorfenapyrCucumberEfficacyEmamectin benzoateNano-formulationsResidues

Identifiers

PMID40360632

DOI10.1038/s41598-025-99726-x

PMCPMC12075760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata

LicenceCC BY

Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.