ArticleScientific reports2025
Multi-wavelength imaging photoplethysmography for non-invasive and non-contact assessment of burn severity.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-contact alcohol detection in mice using an imaging photoplethysmography (IPPG) system.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Preparation and Characterization of Double-Network Composite Hydrogels with Carboxymethyl Pachymaran in Promoting Wound Healing.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We report a non-contact burn severity assessment system using the image-based photoplethysmography (IPPG) technique by fabricating a multi-wavelength imaging system. In this burn assessment system, four wavelengths (visible light wavelengths of 405 nm, 520 nm, 660 nm, and near-infrared wavelength of 940 nm) were used, and burn severity was identified based on the fact that each wavelength has different penetration depths. Each wavelength was set to irradiate with the same optical power (1 mW/cm²), and IPPG was acquired using images captured at 35 frames per second for wavelengths with different penetration depths. To measure burn severity, we created burn lesion models using hairless mice. For each degree of burn, we acquired images of the burn area at four different wavelengths, measured IPPG from the acquired images, and observed the signal change at each wavelength to evaluate burn severity. In addition, while monitoring the healing process, we observed that IPPG recovered as the blood flow in the tissue normalized. Through the results of this study, we expect that IPPG technology will be used not only as a non-contact technology to evaluate burn severity, but also as a new method to monitor the burn recovery process in real time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.