Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360595›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A pharmacovigilance analysis of post-marketing safety of durvalumab.

An-Ju Tan, Wan-Ying Liu, Jun-Li Lu, Qing-Ying Tan, Yu Yan, Dun-Chang Mo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

An-Ju Tan *Office of Drug Clinical Trials Institutions, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Wan-Ying Liu *Office of Drug Clinical Trials Institutions, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Jun-Li LuOffice of Drug Clinical Trials Institutions, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Qing-Ying TanReproductive Medical Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Yu YanOffice of Drug Clinical Trials Institutions, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, China.
Dun-Chang MoDepartment of Tumor Radiotherapy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Dan-Cun Road No.13, Nanning, Guangxi, China. 18878713362@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Durvalumab has demonstrated significant efficacy in several types of malignancies, while large-scale real-world safety studies remain limited. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the safety of durvalumab through data mining of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). We extracted reports of durvalumab as the primary suspected drug from the FAERS database (January 2017 to June 2024). Four disproportionality analysis algorithms were used to detect signals between durvalumab and adverse events (AEs). Durvalumab was recorded in 10,120 reports as the primary suspected drug. Of these, 43.6% of AEs occurred during the first month of treatment, with a median onset time of 40 days (IQR: 14-99 ). Among 181 potential signals, 64 were unexpected preferred terms not listed in the prescribing information, including cytokine release syndrome (CRS), pulmonary tuberculosis, radiation esophagitis, oesophageal fistula, oesophageal perforation, pleural effusion, pneumothorax, cerebral infarction, biliary tract infection, cholecystitis, psoriasiform dermatitis, portal vein thrombosis, acute cholangitis and pericarditis malignant. Serious adverse events accounted for 93.3% of cases. Males exhibited a significantly higher risk of experiencing serious outcomes compared to females (OR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.52-2.19, P < 0.001). Older age groups demonstrated an elevated risk of severe outcomes relative to those under 65 years (65-74 years: OR = 1.52, 95% CI: 1.15-2.00, P = 0.003; ≥75 years: OR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.02-1.92, P = 0.038). This study comprehensively assessed the safety of durvalumab and discovered potential new adverse event signals, which may provide critical support for risk identification and monitoring of durvalumab.

Indexed as

Antibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNeoplasmsPharmacovigilanceProduct Surveillance, PostmarketingAdultAdverse Drug Reaction Reporting SystemsAgedAged, 80 and overDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationAntibodies, MonoclonalAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicaldurvalumabAdverse eventsCytokine-release syndromeDurvalumabFAERSPharmacovigilancePulmonary tuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID40360595
PMCPMC12075497

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.