ArticleScientific reports2025
Development and internal validation of a prediction model for rheumatoid arthritis: a case-control study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antirheumatic Medication Calendar Significantly Improves Adherence in First-Time Methotrexate Users: A Prospective, Single-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Trial
- The Therapeutic Potential of Phytochemicals Unlocks New Avenues in the Management of Rheumatoid Arthritis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study measured sociodemographic characteristics, dietary habits, lifestyle habits, genetics, and other factors that may contribute to the development of Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA). Independent risk factors for RA were identified by logistic regression analysis, and a prediction model was constructed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the prediction accuracy of the model, and the calibration of the model was evaluated by the Hosmer-Lemeshow test. A total of 432 participants, comprising 216 healthy individuals and 216 patients diagnosed with RA at two hospitals in Sichuan, China, from March 2022 to January 2023 were included in this study. Logistic regression analysis revealed that occupation type, place of residence, history of mumps, dietary combination, sweet, damp dwelling, fish, vaccine history, and rs805297 were significantly associated with the pathogenesis of RA. The model constructed in this study showed good prediction, with an AUC of 0.912. The Youden index was 0.699, the sensitivity was 0.847 and the specificity was 0.852. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test results (χ
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.