Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360584›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Microscopic anthropogenic waste ingestion by small terrestrial European passerines: evidence from finch and tit families.

Krzysztof Deoniziak, Anna Winiewicz, Marta Nartowicz, Weronika Mierzejewska, Sławomir Niedźwiecki, Wojciech Pol, Alina T Dubis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krzysztof DeoniziakDivision of Biodiversity and Behavioural Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, Konstantego Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245, Białystok, Poland. k.deoniziak@uwb.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6447-6655
Anna WiniewiczThe Włodzimierz Chętnicki Biological Science Club, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, Konstantego Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245, Białystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7232-638X
Marta NartowiczThe Włodzimierz Chętnicki Biological Science Club, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, Konstantego Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245, Białystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-5641-3523
Weronika MierzejewskaThe Włodzimierz Chętnicki Biological Science Club, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, Konstantego Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245, Białystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-1225-7173
Sławomir NiedźwieckiGlass Traps Foundation, Brzezina 10, 55-330, Brzezina, Poland.
Wojciech PolDepartment of Water Ecology, Faculty of Biology, University of Bialystok, Ciołkowskiego 1J, 15-245, Białystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6584-5261
Alina T DubisFaculty of Chemistry, University of Bialystok, Konstantego Ciołkowskiego 1K, 15-245, Białystok, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2594-8386

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microscopic anthropogenic waste (MAW) has become a major environmental concern worldwide. Our study aimed to assess the accumulation of MAW in the gastrointestinal tracts of nine common European passerine species from finch (Fringillidae) and tit (Paridae) families, and evaluate their suitability for environmental monitoring. We searched for MAW in the birds' stomachs and intestines and identified suspected particles using Raman microspectroscopy. In total, we found 57 MAW particles in 31 out of 149 analyzed individuals, 7 of which were microplastics (polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, polystyrene), 1 was identified as carbon nanotube, while 49 were cellulosic-based (cotton, cellulose, rayon, viscose). The generalized linear mixed models identified bird family and time in season as significant predictors of MAW ingestion. Finches ingested more MAW than tits, and higher ingestion rates were observed during the non-breeding period. Other predictors, including bird sex, age, gastrointestinal tract section, and site, showed varying but non-significant effects. As predicted, the studied species exhibited a lower ingestion rate of MAW compared to terrestrial birds studied so far, possibly due to their diet and feeding behavior. Given that these species are prey for many avian and non-avian predators, they may contribute to the transfer of MAW to higher trophic levels.

Indexed as

Anthropogenic EffectsFinchesPasseriformesAnimalsEnvironmental MonitoringEuropeFemaleGastrointestinal TractMaleMicroplasticsMicroplasticsBirdsCellulosic fibersMicrofibersMicroplasticsRaman microspectroscopyTerrestrial ecosystems

Identifiers

PMID40360584
PMCPMC12075826

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.