ArticleScientific reports2025
Generative AI tool use enhances academic achievement in sustainable education through shared metacognition and cognitive offloading among preservice teachers.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Letter to the Editor: Blind spots in radiology leadership regarding human resources and organization management in the era of artificial intelligence.European radiology · 2026Article
- Research on the Impact of Generative Artificial Intelligence Usage Behavior on the Learning Outcomes of Higher Vocational Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- The Impact of Unscaffolded GenAI Use on Pre-Service Teachers' AI Readiness, Self-Regulated Learning, Critical Thinking, and Instructional Design Performance: A Quasi-Experimental Study.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Research on factors influencing teaching staff's continued use intention of AIGC tools: based on structural equation modeling and artificial neural networks.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Driving sustainable innovation outcomes through employee AI collaboration with the mediating role of sustainable career capacities.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unpacking the relationship between self-control and academic engagement: the mediating role of meaning in life and the moderating role of GenAI dependence.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- Sustainable adoption of artificial intelligence and the Metaverse in higher education: an environmental, social, and governance-based analysis of pedagogical innovation and perceived student learning outcomes.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- What drives preservice teachers' use of generative AI as instructional media? A structural and configurational analysis.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Article
- Layer-sensitive cognitive offloading in generative AI-assisted writing: supported performance and independent no-AI outcomes.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Cognitive offloading and metacognitive calibration in generative AI-mediated doctoral learning: a grounded theory study of accountable reconstruction.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- Instructional design communication through AI-assisted storytelling: a hybrid model grounded in educational psychology.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- The chain mediating role of critical thinking and AI self-efficacy in GenAI usage competence and engineering students' creativity.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The integration of generative artificial intelligence tools in education has emerged as a transformative approach to enhancing learning outcomes, particularly in the context of sustainable development goals (SDG4). Therefore, the present study investigates the connection between generative artificial intelligence tool usage (GenAITU) and academic achievement (AA) in the context of SDG4. We assessed the mediating role of shared metacognition (SMC) and cognitive offloading (COL) in this relationship among preservice teachers (PSTs). The indicators, including performance expectancy (PE), effort expectancy (EE), facilitating conditions (FC), and use behavior (UB), are derived from adapting the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology 2 (UTAUT2) for GenAITU. The authors surveyed 465 students from five universities in Wuhan, China, using a 7-point Likert scale through a time-lag design. Statistical analysis was performed through partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM), to determine the relationship between variables. Findings indicated that two components of GenAITU, namely PE and UB, showed significant positive associations with AA, while the other two, EE and FC, did not show significant and positive relationships with AA. Results also showed that three dimensions of GenAITU, namely EE, FC, and UB have a positive and significant association with SMC while PE has a positive and significant connection with SMC. All four components of GenAITU like PE, EE, FC, and UB have positive and significant links with COL. SMC and COL have a positive and significant relationship with AA. Results also indicated that SMC mediated the connections between GenAITU (EE, FC, and UB) and AA. Outcomes also indicated that COL mediated the connections between GenAITU (PE, EE, FC, and UB) and AA. The current study shows that SMC and COL were strong mediators of the association between GenAITU and AA. The results of our study provide guidance to teachers, curriculum planners, and university management to successfully integrate GenAITU into the education for PSTs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.