Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360554›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Quantifying the impact of surface roughness on contact angle dynamics under varying conditions.

Mehdi Razavifar, Arastoo Abdi, Ehsan Nikooee, Omidreza Aghili, Masoud Riazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Role of CaCOMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mehdi RazavifarFaculty of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, 5166616471, Iran.
Arastoo AbdiEnhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Research Centre, IOR/EOR Research Institute, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
Ehsan NikooeeDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Shiraz University, Shiraz, 7134851156, Iran.
Omidreza AghiliDepartment of Petroleum Engineering, Ahvaz Faculty of Petroleum, Petroleum University of Technology (PUT), Ahvaz, Iran.
Masoud RiaziEnhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) Research Centre, IOR/EOR Research Institute, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran. masoud.riazi@nu.edu.kz.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite extensive research in recent years to clarify the role of fluid composition on reservoir wettability, understanding the properties of rock and its solid surface characteristics and their effects on wettability and its alteration remains limited and requires further investigation. This study utilized sandpaper with different roughness levels to examine the effect of roughness on the contact angles of n-heptane, crude oil (CO), brine, and deionized water (DW) with solid surfaces. In a DW-air-solid system, the measurements indicate that increasing the surface roughness beyond a certain point decreases the surface's affinity for the fluid. A similar trend was observed with the brine, although the contact angle values for the rough surfaces in contact with the brine were slightly higher than those for the DW. Increasing the surface roughness significantly decreases the contact angle between the solid and the crude oil droplet in a CO-air-solid system. In the n-heptane-air-solid system, the droplet completely spreads on the solid, regardless of the surface roughness. This variability underscores the importance of fluid-solid interactions. The CO-brine-solid system exhibits behavior similar to that of DW, with the brine generally resulting in higher contact angle values across all examined roughness levels. The examination of the contact angles for various fluids in the liquid-air-solid and liquid-liquid-solid systems shows that the contact angle depends on the mean surface roughness, the surface roughness profile, the chemistry of the fluids, and the type of fluid trapped between the droplet and the rough surface. The findings demonstrate that the effect of roughness on surface wettability cannot be interpreted solely based on the wettability of a smooth surface or the increased area due to surface roughness. The variation in the curvature of the trapped fluid can significantly influence the wettability of rough surfaces. These findings enable optimized oil recovery and flow management by demonstrating how surface roughness enhances wettability control improving oil displacement, reducing capillary trapping, and refining reservoir models. Additionally, they support engineered solutions for shale production and fouling prevention, significantly increasing operational efficiency across petroleum systems.

Indexed as

Contact angleFluid compositionHeterogeneitySurface roughnessWettability

Identifiers

PMID40360554
PMCPMC12075657

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.