ArticleScientific reports2025
The effect of gastric acid on the bonding of 3D printed and CAD/CAM denture acrylics to denture teeth.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effects of Gastric Acid and Antiacid Medications on Surface Roughness, Morphology, and Optical Properties of Resin-Based Materials.Polymers · 2026Article
- Surface pretreatments and erosive aging effects on the bond strength of CAD/CAM resin-based materials with a self-adhesive resin cement.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to compare the shear bond strength (SBS) of denture base resin (DBR) and dental materials produced by different methods and to investigate the effect of artificial gastric acid on bond strength. Heat-polymerized, subtractive (CAD/CAM-milled) and additive (3D printing) DBR-teeth combinations were investigated. 5 × 5 × 2 mm teeth, 10Ø, 2 mm high base samples were produced according to the manufacturer's instructions. The teeth specimens were bonded with the same type of DBR and immersed in artificial gastric acid solution. They were stored in an incubation device at 37 °C for 96 h. The SBS test was performed on a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis of the results was performed using ANOVA and Games-Howell (α = 0.05). The mean SBS was highest in the 3D printed group (15.08 ± 4.25 MPa). This was followed by heat-polymerized (12.90 ± 3.00 MPa ), then CAD/CAM-milled group (6.57 ± 2.01 MPa ). The manufacturing method significantly affected the SBS (P < 0.001), but artificial gastric acid did not significantly change the SBS of any group (P = 0.488). The 3D printed group showed the highest bond strength. 3D printing method can be used safely in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.