Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Feihong Liu *Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Shasha Yao *Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Jia LiShenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Kejie HuangShenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Dongdong ZhangShenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Tak Man WongShenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China.
Ruikang TangCenter for Biomaterials and Biopathways, Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. rtang@zju.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5277-7338
Kelvin W K YeungShenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China. wkkyeung@hku.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0887-088X
Jun WuShenzhen Key Laboratory for Innovative Technology in Orthopaedic Trauma, Guangdong Engineering Technology Research Center for Orthopaedic Trauma Repair, Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, The University of Hong Kong-Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, China. wuj7@hku-szh.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5246-147X
Funding
Food and Health Bureau of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region | Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF) 22210832Food and Health Bureau of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region | Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF) 23220752Food and Health Bureau of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region | Health and Medical Research Fund (HMRF) 23220952Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China (Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology) 2023YFB3810200Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission JCYJ20200109150420892Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission JCYJ20210324120009026Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission JCYJ20220530142206014Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission JCYJ20230807113016033
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
In the pursuit of replicating the remarkable mechanical properties of natural biological composites like bone and seashell, developing artificial bulk materials that seamlessly integrate rigid inorganic components with ductile organic constituents has been a longstanding challenge. A key hurdle has been the establishment of robust and reliable linkages between these disparate building blocks. Mechanical metamaterials achieved by well-designed chemical structures, however, offer a promising solution to address this challenge. In this study, we demonstrate that the calcium phosphate-based inorganic-organic hybrid metamaterials trapping inorganic nanoparticles within long-chain polymeric networks and anchoring inorganic blocks to these networks via short-chain organic crosslinkers exhibit switchable and tunable high stiffness and elasticity. Additionally, these metamaterials not only exhibit peculiar mechanical characteristics, but also present excellent biocompatibility, as demonstrated by the in vivo tests using male rats and the in vitro tests. These results suggest a wide range of potential clinical applications.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Inorganic-organic hybrid metamaterials with switchable high stiffness and elasticity. · full record | OpenQuestion