Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360467›Full record

ReviewNature communications2025

Combining spatial transcriptomics with tissue morphology.

Eduard Chelebian, Christophe Avenel, Carolina Wählby

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Eduard ChelebianDepartment of Information Technology and SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6852-6605
Christophe AvenelDepartment of Information Technology and SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1835-921X
Carolina WählbyDepartment of Information Technology and SciLifeLab, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. carolina.wahlby@it.uu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4139-7003

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Spatial transcriptomics has transformed our understanding of tissue architecture by preserving the spatial context of gene expression patterns. Simultaneously, advances in imaging AI have enabled extraction of morphological features describing the tissue. This review introduces a framework for categorizing methods that combine spatial transcriptomics with tissue morphology, focusing on either translating or integrating morphological features into spatial transcriptomics. Translation involves using morphology to predict gene expression, creating super-resolution maps or inferring genetic information from H&E-stained samples. Integration enriches spatial transcriptomics by identifying morphological features that complement gene expression. We also explore learning strategies and future directions for this emerging field.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingTranscriptomeAnimalsHumans

Identifiers

PMID40360467
PMCPMC12075478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.