Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360397›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Uncovering variation in cholecystitis treatment: protocol and statistical analysis plan for a nationwide observational study - the Dutch Cholecystitis Snapshot Study (Dutch CHESS).

Max H G van Maasakkers, Teus J Weijs, Lucas Goense, Krijn P van Lienden, Peter van Duijvendijk, Robert C Verdonk, Djamila Boerma

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06349863 (Variation in Cholecystitis Treatment and Outcome in the Netherlands; a Nation-wide Cohort Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06349863 recruitingnot on this map

Variation in Cholecystitis Treatment and Outcome in the Netherlands; a Nation-wide Cohort Study

TypeobservationalSponsorSt. Antonius HospitalRan2024 to 2025Enrolled3,000ConditionsCholecystitis, Cholecystitis, Gallstone, Cholecystitis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Max H G van MaasakkersDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands m.van.maasakkers@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0003-6731-7205
Teus J WeijsDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Lucas GoenseDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Krijn P van LiendenDepartment of Radiology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Peter van DuijvendijkDepartment of Surgery, Gelre Hospitals, Apeldoorn, Gelderland, The Netherlands.
Robert C VerdonkDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Djamila BoermaDepartment of Surgery, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCholecystitis is a highly prevalent disease that imposes a substantial burden on the healthcare system. Despite strong underlying evidence, guideline adherence in the treatment of cholecystitis remains low. Moreover, important gaps in knowledge persist that must be addressed to optimise existing guidelines. The primary aim is to assess the nationwide variation in cholecystitis treatment and identify opportunities to improve guideline adherence. Secondary aims include determining the best cystic duct closure method; the best model to predict concomitant choledocholithiasis; the optimal treatment for cholecystitis lasting 7 days or more at diagnosis and the optimal strategy for gallbladder drainage and post-drainage care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Dutch CHESS is a multicentre observational cohort study, including 67 out of 69 Dutch hospitals. From 1 April to 30 September 2024, all patients diagnosed with cholecystitis (Tokyo Guidelines definition) will be prospectively identified. Data on patient characteristics, treatment and outcome (with 6-month follow-up) will be collected to address the primary and secondary aims. For the primary aim, guideline adherence is defined as the percentage of patients who undergo early cholecystectomy for cholecystitis lasting 0-7 days. Current adherence, nationally and for each individual hospital, along with predictors of adherence, will be determined. The adherence of each hospital will be set against the national average and best practices. To further support improvement, the impact of guideline adherence on total hospital stay and morbidity will be determined. Three months after performance feedback to the participating hospitals, the impact on local practice will be assessed through questionnaires. Subgroup analyses and statistical methods for addressing both the primary and secondary aims are predefined in this protocol. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The Medical research Ethics Committees United reviewed the protocol and decided that the Dutch Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act is not applicable (reference Number: W23.225). Approval was obtained from the institutional review board and board of directors at each participating hospital. Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. STUDY REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06349863; Pre-results.

Indexed as

CholecystectomyCholecystitisGuideline AdherenceDrainageHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicNetherlandsObservational Studies as TopicResearch DesignEndoscopyGASTROENTEROLOGYHepatobiliary surgeryInterventional radiologySURGERY

Identifiers

PMID40360397
PMCPMC12083269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.