ArticleBMJ open quality2025
Addressing food insecurity: a paediatric academic advocacy collaborative quality initiative.
Article in BMJ open quality, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis quality improvement (QI) initiative aimed to address food insecurity (FI) by improving FI identification and referral to food assistance programmes for the families served by the eight paediatric academic institutions in North and South Carolina.
methodsThe primary process measures were screening 80% of eligible families for FI and coding for FI. The outcome measure was referring 80% of families identified with FI to appropriate resources. The balancing measure was maintaining a rate below 20% of missed opportunities for referral. Change ideas were organised into four main key drivers. The eight teaching clinics of the Carolinas Collaborative completed monthly chart audits using the Quality Improvement Data Aggregator (QIDA). Baseline was December 2020 and implementation occurred January 2021-May 2022. Creation of run charts was later transferred to statistical process control charts. Standard probability or Montgomery rules were used to identify special cause variation. Sites used individual QIDA data to conduct Plan-Do-Study-Act cycles; aggregated data were shared during bimonthly meetings.
resultsA total of 4270 eligible charts were audited, 3430 patients screened and 525 identified as having FI. The rate of FI screening shifted from 68.5% to 86%. The rate of FI identified remained at 15%, and food referrals were consistently offered 90% of the time. While FI diagnostic coding did not reach the 80% goal, there was a shift from 38.3% to 70.5%. The balancing measure remained well below the goal of less than 20% of missed opportunities to discuss positive FI (centreline of 9.5%).
conclusionsA paediatric academic collaborative QI initiative focused on FI demonstrated collective improvement and allowed for rapid implementation, dissemination and spread.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.