ArticleInternational wound journal2025
Bench to Bedside Evaluation of an Innovative, Non-Bordered Foam Dressing for Use in Exudating Chronic Wounds.
Article in International wound journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To investigate a dimpled, non-bordered foam dressing with a soft silicone wound contact layer, the research spans from bench (fluid handling performance) to bedside (clinical effectiveness on exuding chronic wounds). In vitro methodology was used to monitor the fluid handling capacity and fluid retention capacity of the investigational dressing compared to other commercially available foam dressings according to standard EN 13726:2023. To provide complementary clinically relevant fluid handling results, more advanced laboratory tests were conducted using the FLUHTE (FLUid Handling Test Equipment) wound simulator. In a paired clinical investigation, moderately to highly exuding chronic wounds of patients had the investigational dressing applied as part of the wound management regime, and healing-related parameters were assessed for up to six weeks. The investigational dressing significantly outperformed the other dressings in fluid dispersion ability. Overall, the investigational dressing performed well in terms of fluid handling, including under compression. In the clinical investigation, the use of the dressing was associated with substantial wound improvement, reductions in size and exudate levels, and improved patient quality of life scores. At the final visit, nine (13.2%) patients had wounds that had healed. There were no adverse device effects reported. Data from the advanced laboratory tests highlighted the substantial impact of dressing design on fluid handling performance. The investigational dressing effectively handled fluid, even when subjected to mechanical forces mimicking those that it would be subjected to in the clinical setting. The clinical results support the use of the dressing on moderately and highly exuding chronic wounds of various clinical origins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.