Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40360241›Full record

ArticleOtology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology2025

Factors Associated with Preoperative Patient Expectations in the Cochlear Implant Evaluation Process.

Christian M Shannon, Joshua E Fabie, Brittany N Hand, Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac, Judy R Dubno, Theodore R McRackan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Christian M ShannonDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Joshua E FabieDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Brittany N HandSchool of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Kara C Schvartz-LeyzacDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Judy R DubnoDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.
Theodore R McRackanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.

Funding

Interpreting Functional Cochlear Implant Outcomes for Individual PatientsR01DC020709 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI Theodore Richardson McRackan · 2023 to 2026
$2.0M
A New Quality-of-Life Instrument to Assess Functional Outcomes of Cochlear Implantation in AdultsK23DC016911 · NIDCD · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI MCRACKAN, THEODORE RICHARDSON · 2019 to 2021
$659k
NIDCD NIH HHS K23 DC016911NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC020709
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine what factors are associated with patients' preoperative expectations of their postimplantation experience with their cochlear implant devices. STUDY

designA retrospective review of data from a prospectively maintained cochlear implant database was conducted.

settingTertiary, academic hospital. PATIENTS: Adult patients who underwent a cochlear implant candidacy evaluation and completed the CIQOL-Expectations validated instrument were included.

resultsAge was found to have a weak association with increased expectations in some domains of the CIQOL-Expectations. There were some very weak associations identified between a patient's baseline functional ability and their expectations in the corresponding domain. However, no modifiable variable included in the current analysis was found to have an association with patient expectations.

conclusionUnderstanding patient expectations is a critical part of the success of medical interventions such as cochlear implantation. However, they are complex and likely multifactorial, and future studies are needed to look at other potential variables that may contribute to their formation.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAge FactorsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesYoung AdultAudiologyCochlear implantEvaluationExpectations

Identifiers

PMID40360241
PMCPMC13215566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.