ArticleBJGP open2025
Patient perceptions of relational continuity in England: insights from two cross-sectional surveys.
Article in BJGP open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Continuity of care in UK primary care: a scoping review of measures, challenges, and future interventions.Primary health care research & development · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeclining continuity of care in England could disproportionately affect some patient groups.
aimTo examine patients' perceptions of continuity of primary care, identify factors associated with continuity, and measure changes in continuity of care for different patient groups, following primary care network (PCN) implementations. DESIGN &
settingCross-sectional surveys were undertaken of patients from three groups (older adults with polypharmacy, patients with mild or moderate anxiety or depression, and working-age adults [18-45 years]), attending 19 practices in five PCNs in England, at two timepoints (November 2021-April 2022 and November 2022-April 2023).
methodRelational continuity was measured using the Nijmegen Continuity Questionnaire (NCQ) score. Differences between patient groups and two timepoints were tested using multiple linear regression.
resultsSurvey response rates were
conclusionWe found differences in experienced continuity of care between patient groups. Relational continuity depends on seeing a preferred GP, not a non-preferred GP or other healthcare professional (HCP). Better continuity was associated with larger practice networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.