ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2025
Perceiving object size in pictures involves high-level processing.
Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Perceiving object size in pictures involves high-level processing.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Spatial context is critical for telling how big a visual object is, although it may also cause the perceived size to diverge dramatically from the true dimensions. Interestingly, responses in the primary visual cortex (V1) mirror such illusory perception; however, the stage of processing that leads to such neural correlates remains unknown. Here, we tested the involvement of higher level processing in a Ponzo-like illusion, by quantifying the effect of manipulating depth cues and inversion of the whole scene. We report a stronger illusion for realistic compared with simpler backgrounds, and for upright compared with inverted scenes (except for scenes where the target objects appeared on the ceiling or in the sky). Next, using functional MRI, we tested the effect of inversion on V1 responses. Inverted scenes elicited a smaller extent of activation in V1 compared with upright scenes, consistent with their perceived sizes. Taken together, since the inversion should disrupt the high-level processing while keeping the low-level features intact, our findings demonstrate that Ponzo-like illusions involve high-level processes that integrate contextual depth cues and visual experience, thereby modulating the object's neural representation in V1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.