ArticleBiology letters2025
Recognition of predator cues hinders social communication.
Article in Biology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cryptic Vocal Communication in the Proboscis Bat (Rhynchonycteris naso).Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2026Article
- Recognition of predator cues hinders social communication.Biology letters · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Anti-predator defences often rely on perception and discrimination of cues from predators, and alteration of behaviour by potential prey. The characteristics of acoustic signals allow eavesdropping on calls of predators, permitting listeners to gauge predation risk by assessing the location and identity of the signaller. We tested the ability of bats that are preyed upon by other bats to discriminate between echolocation calls of predators and non-predators and the impact of risk reduction strategies on communication. Bats distinguished between echolocation calls of predators and non-predators, recognizing predator calls with high accuracy. However, bats were more cautious when the structure of non-predator calls was similar to predator calls. In the presence of predator calls, bats ceased social communication, which could impact sociality and disrupt group cohesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.