ArticleEnvironmental microbiology reports2025
Urbanisation and Lockdown Impact on Airborne Fungal Communities in Tropical Landscapes: A Comparative Study of Urban and Peri-Urban Environments.
Article in Environmental microbiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study assessed the concentration, composition, and spatiotemporal distribution of airborne fungi in a metropolitan area, comparing urban and peri-urban sites across rainy and dry seasons. An 8-month fungal bioaerosol monitoring was conducted using a six-stage Andersen cascade impactor. Data analysis involved generalised linear regression models and multifactorial ANOVA to assess the relationships between meteorological conditions, sampling sites, campaigns, fungal concentrations, and impactor stages. Additionally, a Bayesian neural network was developed to predict bioaerosol dynamics based on the analysed variables. We identified 10 viable fungal species, including Aspergillus niger, Aspergillus nidulans, Aspergillus. fumigatus, Aspergillus terreus, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus versicolor, Penicillium spp. and Fusarium oxysporum. Notable differences in the aerodynamic sizes of fungal particles influenced their distribution and potential impact on the respiratory system. The Bayesian neural network successfully predicted fungal bioaerosol concentrations with an accuracy of 76.87%. Our findings reveal the significant role of environmental and human-related factors in shaping bioaerosol distribution in tropical urban contexts. This research provides essential insights into the behaviour of fungal bioaerosols, highlighting their relevance for public health, especially for immunocompromised populations, and their impact on local agriculture. Furthermore, it demonstrates the potential of fungal bioaerosols as bioindicators for environmental monitoring and predictive modelling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.