ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Role of X chromosome and dosage-compensation mechanisms in complex trait genetics.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Escape from X inactivation drives sex differences in gene expression.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Hemispheric Asymmetry in the Genetic Overlap between Schizophrenia and White Matter Microstructure.Cyborg and bionic systems (Washington, D.C.) · 2026Article
- X chromosome inactivation across primary human tissues is mostly complete, with significant implications for genetic and clinical studies.BMC genomics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The X chromosome (chrX) is often excluded from genome-wide association studies due to its unique biology complicating the analysis and interpretation of genetic data. Consequently, the influence of chrX on human complex traits remains debated. Here, we systematically assessed the relevance of chrX and the effect of its biology on complex traits by analyzing 48 quantitative traits in 343,695 individuals in UK Biobank with replication in 412,181 individuals from FinnGen. We show that, in the general population, chrX contributes to complex trait heritability at a rate of 3% of the autosomal heritability, consistent with the amount of genetic variation observed in chrX. We find that a pronounced male bias in chrX heritability supports the presence of near-complete dosage compensation between sexes through X chromosome inactivation (XCI). However, we also find subtle yet plausible evidence of escape from XCI contributing to human height. Assuming full XCI, the observed chrX contribution to complex trait heritability in both sexes is greater than expected given the presence of only a single active copy of chrX, mirroring potential dosage compensation between chrX and the autosomes. We find this enhanced contribution attributable to systematically larger active allele effects from chrX compared to autosomes in both sexes, independent of allele frequency and variant deleteriousness. Together, these findings support a model in which the two dosage-compensation mechanisms work in concert to balance the influence of chrX across the population while preserving sex-specific differences at a manageable level. Overall, our study advocates for more comprehensive locus discovery efforts in chrX.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.