ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Reannotation of cancer mutations based on expressed RNA transcripts reveals functional non-coding mutations in melanoma.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- To be or not to be a protein coding mutation, that's the question!NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The role of synonymous mutations in cancer pathogenesis is currently underexplored. We developed a method to detect significant clusters of synonymous and missense mutations in public cancer genomics data. In melanoma, we show that 22% (11/50) of these mutation clusters are misannotated as coding mutations because the reference transcripts used for their annotation are not expressed. Instead, these mutations are actually non-coding. This, for instance, applies to the mutation clusters targeting known cancer genes kinetochore localized astrin (SPAG5) binding protein (KNSTRN) and BCL2-like 12 (BCL2L12), each affecting 4%-5% of melanoma tumors. For the latter, we show that these mutations are functional non-coding mutations that target the shared promoter region of interferon regulatory factor 3 (IRF3) and BCL2L12. This results in downregulation of IRF3, BCL2L12, and tumor protein p53 (TP53) expression in a CRISPR-Cas9 primary melanocyte model and in melanoma tumors. In individuals with melanoma, these mutations were also associated with a worse response to immunotherapy. Finally, we propose a simple automated method to more accurately annotate cancer mutations based on expressed transcripts. This work shows the importance of integrating DNA- and RNA-sequencing data to properly annotate mutations and identifies a number of previously overlooked and wrongly annotated functional non-coding mutations in melanoma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.