Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40359918›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025

Public Opinions from Malawian and Malawi Refugee Camp Residents of Wastewater and Environmental Surveillance.

Dammy Jeboda, Brandie Banner Shackelford, Petros Chigwechokha, Brighton A Chunga, Ayse Ercumen, Cassandra Workman, Joy L Hart, Ted Smith, Rochelle H Holm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Dammy JebodaDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Brandie Banner ShackelfordThe United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Petros ChigwechokhaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Malawi University of Science and Technology, Limbe, Malawi.
Brighton A ChungaDepartment of Water and Sanitation, Mzuzu University, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Ayse ErcumenDepartment of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.
Cassandra WorkmanDepartment of Anthropology, University of North Carolina Greensboro, Greensboro, North Carolina.
Joy L HartDepartment of Communication, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Ted SmithChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
Rochelle H HolmChristina Lee Brown Envirome Institute, School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Across low- and middle-income countries, there have been calls to expand wastewater and environmental surveillance to include non-sewered sanitation systems. Considering public opinion, understanding, and acceptance, as well as any related privacy and personal health information concerns, is important in this context. This study used an in-person survey to learn more about the perceptions of Malawian and Malawi refugee camp residents regarding wastewater and environmental surveillance as public health tools, as well as their views on privacy and personal health information. A 15-question survey was conducted from May to July 2024 at three locations in northern, central, and southern Malawi, including a refugee camp (N = 536). Some respondents (n = 30) also completed a board game and a post-game survey. The results indicated high public support for surveilling communicable diseases, deadly diseases, environmental toxicants, healthy eating, illegal drugs, mental illnesses, and prescription drugs. Respondents were less supportive of surveillance that might expose their lifestyle behaviors and alcohol use. Regarding sampling locations, the surveillance of an entire city or of camps and schools had the highest acceptance. Some opposition to surveillance in business and religious organizations was noted. If surveilled, respondents wanted the results of the data analysis to be communicated back to them. Our findings suggested that Malawian and Malawi camp residents supported, with little concern, ongoing wastewater and environmental surveillance for public health. Considering privacy thresholds and participant autonomy regarding public health surveillance tools, along with cultural relevance, is important for future policy development and investment.

Indexed as

Environmental MonitoringPublic OpinionRefugee CampsRefugeesWastewaterAdultFemaleHumansMalawiMaleMiddle AgedPrivacyPublic HealthSanitationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultWastewater

Identifiers

PMID40359918
PMCPMC12225556

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.