ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025
Public Opinions from Malawian and Malawi Refugee Camp Residents of Wastewater and Environmental Surveillance.
Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Possibilities and Limitations for Conducting Wastewater and Environmental Surveillance in Refugee Camps Worldwide.American journal of public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Across low- and middle-income countries, there have been calls to expand wastewater and environmental surveillance to include non-sewered sanitation systems. Considering public opinion, understanding, and acceptance, as well as any related privacy and personal health information concerns, is important in this context. This study used an in-person survey to learn more about the perceptions of Malawian and Malawi refugee camp residents regarding wastewater and environmental surveillance as public health tools, as well as their views on privacy and personal health information. A 15-question survey was conducted from May to July 2024 at three locations in northern, central, and southern Malawi, including a refugee camp (N = 536). Some respondents (n = 30) also completed a board game and a post-game survey. The results indicated high public support for surveilling communicable diseases, deadly diseases, environmental toxicants, healthy eating, illegal drugs, mental illnesses, and prescription drugs. Respondents were less supportive of surveillance that might expose their lifestyle behaviors and alcohol use. Regarding sampling locations, the surveillance of an entire city or of camps and schools had the highest acceptance. Some opposition to surveillance in business and religious organizations was noted. If surveilled, respondents wanted the results of the data analysis to be communicated back to them. Our findings suggested that Malawian and Malawi camp residents supported, with little concern, ongoing wastewater and environmental surveillance for public health. Considering privacy thresholds and participant autonomy regarding public health surveillance tools, along with cultural relevance, is important for future policy development and investment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.