ArticleJournal of biomechanics2025
Focal comparison of experimental and finite element derived strain fields in a 3D IVUS-based computational model of vascular tissue under loading.
Article in Journal of biomechanics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Arterial tissues are subjected to mechanical loads that influence biological mechanisms in health and disease. Motivated by these observations, computational models to predict the vascular mechanical environment are increasingly being developed and applied. However, few computational vascular biomechanics studies are evaluated for accuracy. This study aimed to compare the transmural strain fields in healthy vascular tissue under physiologic loading between 3D intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-based finite element (FE) models and image-based experimental measurements. IVUS image data were captured along a ∼ 15 mm segment in porcine carotid arteries (n = 3) in the reference configuration (∼10 mmHg) and at five axial positions under varied pressure loads. FE models were constructed from the full-length segment IVUS data, and model-predicted strains were determined using reported soft and stiff material properties for porcine tissue. Experimental strains were determined at each axial slice across the applied loads using a deformable image registration technique (Hyperelastic Warping). Both FE-predicted and experimental deformations exhibited non-linear behavior under loading, as observed in the material response curves. Following Warping parameter selection, results demonstrated that FE-predicted transmural strains with soft and stiff material properties bounded the experimentally-derived data at systolic pressures; however, sample variability was observed. At systolic pressure, Warping-derived and FE-predicted transmural strains showed good agreement, as RMSE values were < 0.09 and differences < 0.08. In conclusion, this study presents an experimental framework to assess accuracy in IVUS-based FE models, and results indicate that the computational framework can predict realistic deformations of arterial tissue; however, the accuracy strongly depends on tissue-specific material properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.