Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40359448›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Registered Report: Neural correlates of thematic role assignment for passives in Standard Indonesian.

Bernard A J Jap, Yu-Yin Hsu, Stephen Politzer-Ahles

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Sentence Production in Standard Indonesian Agrammatism.Journal of psycholinguistic research · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernard A J JapDepartment of Humanities, Language and Translation, School of Arts and Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Metropolitan University, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5276-9805
Yu-Yin HsuDepartment of Chinese and Bilingual Studies, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4087-4995
Stephen Politzer-AhlesDepartment of Linguistics, University of Kansas, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies conducted across multiple languages have found processing differences between patient-first and agent-first word orders. However, the results of these studies have been inconsistent as they do not identify a specific event-related potential (ERP) component as a unique correlate of thematic role processing. Furthermore, these studies generally confound word order with frequency, as patient-first structures tend to be infrequent in the languages that have been investigated. There is evidence that frequency of syntactic structure plays an important role in language processing. To address this potential confounding variable, we test Standard Indonesian, a language where passive structures occur with high frequency and are comparable in frequency to active structures. In Standard Indonesian, there is evidence from acquisition, corpus, and clinical data indicating that the use of passive is frequent. In the present study, 60 native speakers of Indonesian read 100 sentences (50 active and 50 passive) while EEG was recorded. Our findings reveal neural correlates of thematic role processing in the passive sentence condition - specifically, a positive shift corresponding to a P600 on the verb, and a more sustained positivity on the second noun phrase. These findings support existing evidence that sentences with a 'non-default' word order impose increased cognitive load, as reflected by ERPs, even when they occur with higher frequency in the language.

Indexed as

BrainEvoked PotentialsLanguageAdultElectroencephalographyFemaleHumansIndonesiaMalePre-Registration PublicationReadingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40359448
PMCPMC12074587

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.