ArticlePloS one2025
Healthcare utilization among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with and without herpes zoster, a retrospective administrative data linked cohort study.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundHerpes zoster (HZ) infection is a significant concern among seniors and immunosuppressed patients including those with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We aimed to compare healthcare utilization (HCU) and mortality in RA patients with and without HZ.
methodsPatients from the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative (OBRI) a clinical cohort (2008-2020) were linked to the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), a population health database. Each HZ patient was matched to four non-HZ patients based on sex, age, and HZ diagnosis date. The incidence of primary (HCU including hospitalization, Emergency Department (ED) visits, physician visits) and secondary (mortality and chronic clinical conditions) outcomes was calculated for each cohort, along with the impact of disease activity, patient-reported outcomes, and RA medication on these outcomes.
resultsThe study included 269 RA patients with and 1072 without HZ. At index date (HZ diagnosis) patients with HZ were less likely to have private health insurance (45.7% vs. 56.5%) and more prone to use biologics (30.9% vs. 26.8%) and JAK inhibitors (3.7% vs. 2.6%). Hospitalization/ED visits and mortality were higher in HZ patients, but these differences were not statistically significant after adjusting for other factors. HZ patients had significantly more physician visits (adj IRR: 1.17; 95% CI: 1.03-1.33). Female sex and lower CDAI were associated with fewer physician visits. JAK inhibitor use was associated with increased mortality (adj HR: 4.73, 95% CI: 1.68, 13.4).
conclusionHCU was higher in RA patients with HZ, particularly in physician visits. Disease activity, patient reported outcomes and RA medication used did not have an impact on HCU and mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.