ArticlePLoS computational biology2025
Identifying the DNA methylation preference of transcription factors using ProtBERT and SVM.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- cyberDMR: accurate and robust identification of differentially methylated regions from WGS-derived methylomes.BMC biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the limits of pre-trained embeddings in machine-guided protein design: a case study on predicting AAV vector viability.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Bioinformatics insights into plant genomic imprinting: approaches, challenges, and future perspectives.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transcription factors (TFs) can affect gene expression by binding to certain specific DNA sequences. This binding process of TFs may be modulated by DNA methylation. A subset of TFs that serve as methylation readers preferentially binds to certain methylated DNA and is defined as TFPM. The identification of TFPMs enhances our understanding of DNA methylation's role in gene regulation. However, their experimental identification is resource-demanding. In this study, we propose a novel two-step computational approach to classify TFs and TFPMs. First, we employed a fine-tuned ProtBERT model to differentiate between the classes of TFs and non-TFs. Second, we combined the Reduced Amino Acid Category (RAAC) with K-mer and SVM to predict the potential of TFs to bind to methylated DNA. Comparative experiments demonstrate that our proposed methods outperform all existing approaches and emphasize the efficiency of our computational framework in classifying TFs and TFPMs. Cross-species validation on an independent mouse dataset further demonstrates the generalizability of our proposed framework In addition, we conducted predictions on all human transcription factors and found that most of the top 20 proteins belong to the Krueppel C2H2-type Zinc-finger family. So far, some studies have demonstrated a partial correlation between this family and DNA methylation and confirmed the preference of some of its members, thereby showing the robustness of our approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.